Overview:
A federal judge has blocked former President Trump’s attempt to dismantle the U.S. Department of Education, ruling the move likely exceeded executive authority and violated federal law. The court also ordered the reinstatement of over 1,300 employees who were abruptly laid off as part of the administration’s effort.
In a significant legal setback for the Trump administration, U.S. District Judge Myong Joun issued a preliminary injunction on Thursday halting efforts to dismantle the U.S. Department of Education. The judge’s decision also mandates reinstating over 1,300 employees terminated as part of a mass layoff on March 11.
Judge Myong issued an injunction blocking the administration from proceeding with a plan to gut the Department of Education in an attempt to stop the agency.
“The record abundantly reveals that defendents’ true intention is to effectively dismantle the department without an authorizing statue, “Joun wrote in his findings.
President Donald Trump’s executive order, signed on March 20, directed Education Secretary Linda McMahon to “take all necessary steps to facilitate the closure of the Department of Education.” The administration argued that the move aimed to improve efficiency and return educational authority to states and local communities.
However, Judge Joun found that the administration’s actions likely exceeded executive authority and violated federal law. The court noted that the Department of Education, established by Congress in 1979, plays a critical role in administering federal student loans, enforcing civil rights laws, and supporting special education programs. The judge emphasized that dismantling the department without congressional approval undermines its ability to fulfill these statutory obligations.
A coalition of Democratic-led states, school districts, educators, and unions filed the lawsuit challenging the administration’s actions. They argued that the mass layoffs and proposed closure would cause irreparable harm to students and educators nationwide. The court agreed, stating that the reduction in force had already impaired the department’s capacity to carry out essential functions.
For further details, refer to the court’s memorandum and order: Court Document
